Saturday, June 18, 2011

Craft Beer and Hayek's Economy of Dispersed Knowledge

Craft beer and Hayek’s economy of dispersed knowledge.
The Wisconsin Legislature delivered a body blow to Wisconsin craft brewers in passing the state budget this week. The biennial budget is the only bill that has to be passed. Subsequently it gets loaded up with a lot of bells and whistles that have nothing to do with state spending.
In this case it was a provision that prohibits brewers from owning beer distribution companies. It was inserted into bill to protect Wisconsin brewing giant MillerCoors from rival Anheuser Bush attempting to increase its market share in the state by buying distributors.
The measure prohibits microbrewers from getting wholesalers licenses and selling their beer along with those of other craft brewers. Under the provision the brewing permit, wholesale and retail licenses, which are now given out by municipalities, would instead fall under state regulation.
For many of Wisconsin’s more than thirty-five craft brewers, the change takes a wrecking ball to their business plans which depend on dual roles of craft brewer/craft brew distributor.
This sordid little affair is just foot note to Wisconsin’s budget process, but it illustrates the degree to which big government and big business work hand in hand. The result is more than collateral damage. In total, it is nothing less than an assault on individual economic liberty. It is always justified by a notion of some overall public economic good. Yet ultimately it erodes our economic wellbeing. That is where F. A. Hayek’s notion of the economy of dispersed knowledge comes in.
Hayek envisioned two types of economic knowledge. One is a “scientific” body of knowledge supported by an array of economic statistics through which the economic resources of an industrial economy can be most efficiently utilized. It argues for some degree of economic planning. Examples of the use of this type of knowledge is the Federal Reserve’s tinkering with the money supply, or government stimulus spending in order to spur more rapid growth of the US economy.
The other type of economic knowledge is the dispersed particular knowledge of individuals in a particular time and place. This is the knowledge of Wisconsin’s craft brewers.
In the name of economic development, the Wisconsin lawmakers saw fit to give an edge to MillerCoors in protecting and increasing its market share in Wisconsin over rival Anheuser Bush. Yet ultimately, those “good” intentions may result in fewer brewing jobs and less brewing investment in the state. The craft brewers account for about 5% of the beer sold in Wisconsin and nationwide the cottage industry is growing at 12% a year. More importantly, Wisconsin’s craft brewers an integral part of Wisconsin’s tourism industry.
From Hayek’s perspective, central economic planning can only address and be corrupted by the competing interests of a static economy. Economic planning through the dispersed individual knowledge of time and place ultimately results in the most efficient use of economic resources and drives innovation and economic growth.    

Sunday, May 22, 2011

A Foodstamp Recovery and the Soft Tyranny of the Welfare State

Jay Cost, writing at the Weekly Standard Online, called the current economic recovery a “food stamp” recovery. He noted that since June 2009, when the economy officially began to recover, the number of food stamp recipients increased by almost 10 million to about 44 million now. He also noted that after nearly two years, this recovery is horribly anemic compared to historic standards. full text
I think this something we all intuitively know without digging through the economic data. But, the “food stamp” phenomenon is frighteningly telling.
Ultimately, it is a food rationing program in response to failed household economies. The program began in the mid-1930s in response to a failed US economy. But times are changed. Considering the US Census Bureau estimates there about 113.5 million households in the US, it means nearly 40% are dependent upon a food rationing program to put bread on their tables and are not economically self sufficient.
I know of one middle class professional’s whose descent from affluence to food stamps followed an all too familiar path: a household shattered through divorce; personal saving depleted through college tuition; poor investment decisions on dreams of unrealistic returns; and overextended, all-to-easy lines of credit.
There is more. The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, citing recently released US Census Bureau figures, the number of family households in the City of Milwaukee headed by a married couple fell below fifty percent for the first time in 2010. In 1990 it was 62%, 55% in 2000, and 49.5% in 2010.
Meanwhile the number of school children receiving free or subsidized school breakfasts and lunches has increased to 32 million from 16 million in 2006, according the US Department of Agriculture. And now under a regulatory scheme implementing the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010, the USFDA is telling schools just what they can and cannot serve up for lunch – no more than a cup a week of starchy vegetables like potatoes, corn and peas, for example.
You can see the pattern. How long is it before our generous food stamp vouchers become ration cards in the name of promoting “healthy” diets?
When the household economy fails, the soft tyranny of the Federal welfare state fills the void.
  

Friday, May 6, 2011

LBJ BBQ Brisket

I’m calling this LBJ BBQ brisket in honor of our 36th president. Lyndon B. Johnson was another American peasant president who in fact liked to serve up barb-b-q brisket and baked beans for State dinners held at his Texas ranch.
Despite the fact that his well intentioned Great Society program to eliminate poverty had somewhat just the opposite effect – that resulted in a permanent dependent class, he was nonetheless a ‘good old boy’ at heart. This taped phone conversation of him ordering some Haggar slacks makes my case and it’s hoot. LBJ Orders Haggar Pants • White House Tapes • Miller Center
Now on to the brisket. This recipe is from The Best Little Cookbook in Texas, put out by the Junior League of Abilene. It should be noted that the little cookbooks put out by church groups and such often contain culinary treasures. It should also be noted that this recipe works wonderfully well for pre-cooking pork back ribs prior to finishing them on a grill.
LBJ Brisket adapted from Jane Weaver’s Chuck Wagon Brisket
1 medium onion
3 ribs of celery
2 cloves garlic
1 (4 oz.) bottle of liquid smoke
1 (up to 6 pound) beef brisket or corned beef brisket (see note)
1/8 to ¼ cup BBQ Dry Rub
¾ cup BBQ Sauce
Puree onion, celery and garlic in a blender or food processor and mix with liquid smoke.  Season the brisket on both sides with the BBQ rub, work it in and let stand for ½ hour. Place the brisket in a baking pan and cover it with vegetable – liquid smoke mix. Bake tightly covered for 4 to 5 hours in a 275o oven.
During the final hour add the BBQ sauce to cooking liquids and generously coat the brisket with mix. Bake uncovered for the final hour.
Note: If using corned beef, rinse off the brine and omit the BBQ rub.
So there you have it -- some fine BBQ brisket to serve up with Artisan Baked Beans and Bavarian Cabbage – a peasant’s banquet fit for gathering heads of state.  

Sunday, April 17, 2011

The American Peasant Tripping Down Stalin's Path

America is beginning to confront its long term, structural financial troubles. And they are big ones. Yet one thing is for sure, they will not be solved solely by taxing the “rich.”
We are running a $1.6 trillion deficit. If we taxed all annual household income over $200,000 at 100%, the US Treasury would net just over $2 trillion a year. This is according Investor’s Business Daily, using 2008 IRS data for its analysis.
So just exactly who are these rich? It’s nice to think of corporate senior executives, investment bankers and money managers, all with their fat salaries and bonuses. It’s nice too to think of trial lawyers and medical specialists with their exorbitant fees. The truth is, most of the “rich” Americans are American peasants – small business men.
Using small business as defined by the US Small Business Administration, these are for profit entities that employ fewer than 500. They employ nearly half of those employed in the private sector and historically have accounted for between 60% and 75% of all new jobs created in the private economy. The owners and operators of these businesses on the average earn between $240,000 and $260,000 a year, depending upon whose figures you use.
I am somewhat troubled when I see American public policy proposals following and tripping behind history – particularly when the outcome was hideously ugly. In the 1920s Soviet Communists had a word for wealthy peasant. Kulak, roughly translated it means “the tight fisted ones.” In 1927, it meant any peasant farmer who had the means to employ others. By the end of 1931, it meant any peasant farmer who hadn’t resettled onto a collective. Here is, as best as I can tell, how that story played out. (This is from individual I know, and from the history I’ve read. In a short 2000 words, this is what it looked liked.)
Everything about Stalin’s Soviet Union has a strange, surreal and most certainly nightmarish tenor to it.
The first five year plan was no exception.

In what can only be called an understatement, Stalin biographer Adam Ulam wrote: “But like so many things about Soviet society at the time, almost everything about the plan had an air of unreality. Officially begun in 1928, it was not voted on by the Sixteenth Party Conference until April 1929.”

If nothing else the first five year plan was a watershed event of the Twentieth Century. And as Ulam points out, to this day it remains historically controversial.

Often called the great leap forward, it set out to establish a communist economy and propel the Soviet Union into the industrial age. In what transpired some see one of the greatest crimes of modern history. To other’s it was a breathtaking feat of social engineering, which while ruthless and cruel, laid the foundation for a richer and more rational economy and enabled Russia to withstand the German invasion.    

If Stalin’s methods were somewhat less than benevolent, his ultimate vision was kinder than that recorded by history.

Ulam sums it up this way: “He knew the effort to collectivize through compulsion would mean civil war; he said so in 1924 and 1925 when urged to adopt a more modest policy of collectivization and of “squeezing the kulak,” But it would be a civil war he could he could win. The enemy’s forces would be divided and dispersed, his united and resolute. There would be instead (and there were) tens of thousands of little civil wars: in every soviet village. The poor peasants would help the Party and GPU and, if need be, though this was to be avoided, the Red Army could also be used in the struggle. Once the kulak was done with and the peasant’s were on the collective farms what could they do? They might be unhappy, might rebel here and there or sabotage deliveries, but one could take care of this increasing the GPU forces in the countryside (a was done). And then the tractor would come to make the work easier, and more and more village lads would find industrial employment in the cities The peasant would acquire socialist consciousness and would be grateful to the Party and Comrade Stalin for saving him from what Marx had called “the idiocy of rural life” and enabling him, after a painful but short interval, to enjoy the benefits of a cultured existence in a modern industrial society.”

What followed was any but “a painful but short interval.”  Instead it was a decade of brutal repression during which, according to official Soviet sources, about 40 million people were arrested, executed or otherwise repressed under Stalin. For perspective, the population of the entire Soviet Union was 162 million in 1937.

The official numbers regarding Stalin’s repression did not come to light until 1989. They appeared in the official Soviet press to fill in what were called “blank spots” in Soviet history. Those official numbers include the 5 to 7 million who perished in famine of the early 1930s, and the 5 to 7 million arrested in the “Great Terror” in 1937 and 38.  Of those, 1 million were executed and the rest sent to labor camps where most died. Not counted were the 9 to 11 million peasants who were deported to Siberia from 1930 to 1932. Western historians believe about 5 million of those died after being forced off their land.

The motivation driving this horror was three fold.

First, the peasantry represented a kingdom of darkness that must be conquered. What threatened communism, threatened Russia. Stalin purposely waged a war against the nation’s peasantry.

Secondly, the serious intent of the plan was money. Since defaulting on international loans the Soviet Union had lousy credit rating. Her only source for capital to industrialize was grain. Before the revolution the peasant economy provided up to 12 million tons of grain for export. In 1928 Russia imported 250,000 tons.

And finally, the industrial economy he intended to create needed an abundant supply of cheap labor.

Under the economic plan, the Soviet Union increased its grain exports from 1,000,000 tons in 1929, to 5,400,000 tons in 1930. The issue went beyond grain and foreign capital. An industrial nation needs labor. 80% of Russian labor was locked in agriculture. The peasantry was not inclined to embracing Communist ideals. For comparison, in 1930, US agricultural employment stood at 21.5% of the labor force, according to the US Department of Agriculture.
   
For someone living through the first five year plan, things started getting bad in 1929. There came the taxes. Mass arrests started toward the end of 1929. Stalin, having secured his position, returned to a policies Lenin was forced to abandon in 1921. Collectivization was under way.

If Stalin made his move to crush the Ukrainian peasantry, the wealthy peasantry, the Kulak class, was his first target. The first mass arrests began in late 1929. Stalin announced on December 27, 1929 that his intention was a liquidation of the Kulaks. An official Party ruling, 'On measures for the Elimination of Kulak Households in Districts of Comprehensive Collectivization,' was approved by the Politburo on January 30, 1930.

Initially, a wealthy farmer might have been some one with as much as 100 acres. The definition of wealth in time changed to include some one working 30 or 40 acres.  Finally it included almost anyone deemed undesirable.

According to historian Robert Conquest, when Stalin made his move to crush the peasantry in 1929-30 he also resumed the attack on the Ukraine and its national culture. This attack had been abandoned in the early 1920s, during a time when Soviet government was barely hanging on. In fact for a few years in the mid-1920s was functioning as independent county and there was a small but growing independence movement.

In 1926, the tax on peasants in the Ukraine and the North Caucasus which normally provided the Soviet Union half of its total marketable grain was 3.3 million tons. By 1930 it was been raised to 7.7 million tons. The 1930 harvest was good.

In 1931, that same 7.7 million tons was demanded from a poor harvest of only 18.3 million. This left only 250 pounds of grain per person in the Ukrainian rural population.

Conquest described the plight of a “former landless peasant who served in the army (who) had by 1929 thirty-five acres, two horses, a cow, a hog, five sheep and forty chickens, and a family of six. In 1928 the tax on him was 2500 roubles and 7,500 bushels of grain. He failed to meet this, and his house (worth 1,800 to 2,000 roubles) was forfeited and ‘bought’ for 250 roubles by an activist.”

The first five year plan which was to have run through 1933, was pronounced to have been concluded by the end of 1932. It main industrial targets would not be fulfilled until many years later. Those targets didn’t seem to be the principal point. Goals for farm collectivization, on the other hand, were met many times over by the end of 1930.

In January, 1930, the Soviet Central Committee tripled the rate of collectivization in some regions seeking to complete the process in all grain-producing regions by the fall of 1931. In fact this was largely accomplished by the end of 1930.

By 1932 two million, mostly peasant farmers, were in detention camps.  From there they were deported to Siberia. As many as twenty-percent died in transit. In the spring of 1932 there was again famine in the Ukraine. By the middle of the year three million people were on the move seeking some measure of prosperity. By March of '33, people were dying of starvation on a mass scale, an estimated 5 million perished in the Ukraine.

The famine was entirely a matter of policy. It wasn’t that there wasn’t food available, but simply denied. Conquest writes:

“This was particularly true when the grain was piled up in the open and left to rot. Large heaps of grain lay at Reshetylivka Station, Ooltaya Province, starting to rot but still guarded. From the train, an American correspondent saw ‘a huge pyramid of grain, piled high and smoking from internal combustion.’”

According to Biographer Ulam, Stalin’s wrath against the peasant was motivated by what would happen in the cities of the worker did not have enough food. By 1931 or 32 even that concern was cast aside. In 1929 city dweller ate 47.5 kilograms of meat, poultry and fat. In 1930 it was 33 kilograms; in 1931, 27.3; “and in the terrible year of 1932 less than 17. He was saved from near and actual starvation by a somewhat increased consumption of bread and potatoes.”

During that time the industrial work force almost doubled.

Finally to complete picture of this surreal nightmare were the laws regarding state property. Ulam paints this picture:

“…So in the summer of 1932 a decree was flung out at the peasant: stealing of socialist and kolkhoz property was  to be punishable by death or, if there were mitigating circumstances, by no less than ten years of forced labor or jail. The law, a Soviet author acknowledges, was used not only against thieves but also against those “who maliciously refused to turn over grain for stat procurements,’ i.e., in practice against many who simply kept bread for their families’ needs. Under this law the father of Paul Morozov was shot for concealing grain, having been renounced to the authorities by his fourteen-year-old son. (The young monster, having been garroted by a group of peasants led by his uncle, was the extolled by propaganda as a patriotic saint of the Young Pioneers – the Party’s youth auxiliary.)”

Robert Conquest in his history of collectivization, The Harvest of Sorrow, reports of 11 million dead between 1930 and 1937 from famine, and 3.5 million dying in labor camps. Those exiled were either crowded into camps or simply left in the forest, with only a few axes and shovels to create a new settlement. One such group managed to establish a prosperous community only be discovered in 1950 and then charged with sabotage.

The official figures on the deportations paint broader picture that extends beyond the Ukraine. Here are the ‘blank spots’ that were filled in in 1989.

In 1932 and 33, 1.5 to 2 million peasants were arrested for violating “extremely cruel” laws regarding state property.

In 1935, 1 million former officials, merchants and noblemen from Moscow and other cities were branded “class strangers” and sent away.

During 1937 and 38, between five and seven million were arrested during the “Great Terror.” Of those 1 million were executed outright and the rest sent to labor camps where most of them died.

During World War II, up to two million ethnic Germans were rounded up and deported. Another 3 million Moslems were forced to move. One million of those died.

And finally, and this is precious, after 1940, two to three million people were arrested for reporting late to work, a crime punishable by up to five years in a labor camp.

I’ve posted this because, for what ever reason, here in Wisconsin we’ve become the center stage in what is swelling into a huge national debate, and it’s become ugly. Next time no matter, I’ll serve up a magnificent recipe for BBQ brisket to go with them artisan beans and Bavarian cabbage. To be sure, it is a peasant’s feast.

Saturday, March 26, 2011

Texas Bar-B-Que and Bavarian Red Cabbage

They serve up sausage at the Salt Lick Bar-B-Que in Driftwood, TX. The Salt Lick is a place Austin locals take visitors to for a taste of authentic Texas Bar-B-Que. I had a sample on a recent visit with my sister and her husband who retired to Georgetown, TX.
The Salt Lick was packed on the Saturday night when we were there. By the size of their parking lot and by the presence of the Local Sheriff directing traffic into it, packed seems to be the norm rather than the exception. The night we were there, the wait to be seated was more than an hour.
No big deal, the Salt Lick is an event as much as a restaurant. Bring a cooler of beer and wine and enjoy the wait on the large patio outside. During that time, a waitress brought a large platter of Salt Lick sausage for the waiting patrons to sample.
That which in Texas is simply sausage, in Wisconsin has a name – Smoked Polish Kielbasa. At home, I like Bavarian red cabbage, or sauerkraut with my Kielbasa. In an epiphany I saw my Bavarian cabbage beautifully wed on a plate to bar-b-que ribs or brisket.
The bar-b-qued ribs and brisket at the Salt Lick were excellent, better than I can make at home. They were served with a disappointing run of the mill coleslaw and a mindless potato salad. Had they been served with my Bavarian red cabbage the meal would have been raised to very lofty heights.
Whether this recipe truly Bavarian or not, I don’t know. It’s inspired by the fine German restaurants in the Milwaukee area, of which once there were many but now are only a few. In those restaurants this mildly sweet-sour cabbage was served with roast duck, sauerbraten and the like. When serving duck or sauerbraten at home, I always serve red cabbage with it.
But my Bavarian red cabbage, at heart, is a comfort food. It’s the main dish to be served with a few thick slices of Kielbasa or corn beef, some slices of hearty rye bread such as pumpernickel and a good dark beer. With duck this recipe will serve four, with a few thick slices of Kielbasa it serves two.   
The most important ingredient in this recipe is not explicitly listed. It’s the bacon fat. It’s used to thicken the liquid the cabbage is boiled in into a velvety sauce. While the food Nazi’s would have us believe bacon fat is poison. In moderation all things are good. And bacon fat is one of the many edible oils our peasant grandparents and great-grandparents took full advantage of. Goose grease, tallow and lard are all in their place proper, good and necessary.  
A gingersnap made with goose grease or duck fat is out of this world delicious. I know because that’s how mom made them. If make with bacon fat on the other hand, they would be kind of funky. I know this from mistaking the liquid smoke for vanilla in whipping up a batch of chocolate chip cookies once. But I digress.
Bavarian Red Cabbage:
½ Head Red Cabbage Coarsely Chopped (1 inch x 1 Inch)
1 Apple Cored, Pealed and Chopped
1 Onion Coarsely Chopped
3 Slices of Bacon ½ Inch Dice
Balsamic Vinegar
Water
2 TBS Flower
1 tsp Caraway Seed
Combine the red cabbage, onion, apple and caraway seed in a pot and cover with a ½ and ½ mix of water and vinegar. Fry the bacon and when crisp add it to the pot with a slotted spoon to drain excess fat back into the fry pan. Deglaze the fry pan with vinegar and water then whisk in flour to make roux.
Bring the cabbage to a boil, adding water or vinegar as needed and to adjust the taste. When the apples have softened almost to mush drain of any excess liquid (it should not quite cover the cabbage), return to a boil and slowly add the bacon fat roux to thicken the remaining liquid into a sauce.  
Then, and this is important, eat hearty and enjoy.

Sunday, March 13, 2011

Wisconsin's Family Fight

The Duluth News Tribune reported, March 13: “Wisconsin’s protracted family fight over the budget and public employee unions moved to this Bayfield County town Saturday evening, as embattled Gov. Scott Walker spoke at an invitation-only event and was greeted by at least 2,000 angry protesters outside.”

One of the protest organizers, Scott Griffiths, told the Tribune: “The thing that really got me here is the disparity of wealth that has grown way too out of hand. This is not a Wisconsin thing. This is a global pandemic of wealth buying power.”

On Thursday Walker signed his budget repair bill. The bill applies directly only to state employees. It limits their collective bargaining “rights” to salaries only. Until now benefits, work rules and sick time was all on the table. It also required that state workers contribute 5% of their pay to their pension plan, and increased the contribution from 6% to 12.5% of the cost of their health insurance.

It also: allowed public employee the option to not join the union; ended the deduction of union dues from pay check and; required an annual recertification of the union.

The governor has made it clear the he intends to close $3.5 billion projected state deficit by reducing state aid to schools, counties and municipalities. His budget repair bill offers those the public employers to adopt the same measure with their public employee unions. He says these are the “tools” they need to balance their budgets. 
    
Since he signed the bill, 16 lawmakers are facing recall campaigns. The secretary of state is postponing publishing the law for ten days, the full amount of time allowed. New laws are normally published within 24 hours after they are signed and take effect after publication. Many believe the walkout by all fourteen Democratic senators and now the delayed publication of the law is a stalling tactic to allow public unions time to extend existing contracts.
Finally, a number of lawsuits have been filed challenging the constitutionality of bill.
Wisconsin is locked in a battle between public employee unions and its taxpayers.  Therein lays the irony of Mr. Griffiths’ statement to the Tribune. The median household income in the state is just over $50 thousand. The average Milwaukee Public School teacher’s annual compensation is just shy of $100 thousand and upon retiring enjoys guaranteed pension benefits with lump sum values in excess of $1 million (based on retiring at age 62 with a $40 thousand per year pension).
The rich in Wisconsin are the State’s public employees who buy political power through their unions. This battle isn’t about collective bargaining. It isn’t about contributions to benefits. It’s entirely about political power.

Saturday, March 5, 2011

Weirdness in Madison

In spite of all the political weirdness in Madison, I will offer you a bowl of sanity with a fine cream of chicken, wild rice and shitake mushroom soup.
For this you will need:
2 qts. Full Bodied Chicken Broth
4 oz Wild Rice
1 Large Onion finely diced
3 cup Diced Chicken
½ cup Cream
4 oz Fresh Shitake Mushroom sliced (8 oz would be better)
½ tsp Paprika
¼ tsp Thyme
2 Tbs Butter
2 Tbs Flour
This recipe begins with a full bodied chicken broth. I was fortunate to have the left over carcass from a roasted pasture raised chicken on hand. I simmered this in one quart of water and one quart of low sodium canned chicken broth for two hours until the meat was falling from the bones, but had not been rendered into tasteless mush.
I picked the bones clean and returned them to the pot and let the broth simmer for another hour. The meat from the carcass, wings and neck amounted to three cups.  There are other roads to two quarts of rich chicken broth and three cups of meat. My pasture raised chicken was a four dollar a pound gift. I did not want any of it to go to waste. In the end this chicken was a roast chicken diner for four, soup for six and three sandwiches.
In any case, with two quarts of rich broth at hand, add the wild rice, shitake mushrooms, diced onion, thyme and paprika. Bring to a hard boil, cover, reduce heat to low and simmer, about and hour, until the rice softens and expands. Meanwhile, melt the butter in a sauce pan over a medium burner then mix in the flour and allow it to brown slightly into a blond roux.
When the rice has cooked bring the soup to a boil, add the roux and cream to thicken it, then add the chicken to finish. Adjust seasoning and serve.  The result is a very rich and savory soup. In that there is sanity.
As for the madness in Madison, at issue is a projected $3.5 billion shortfall in the next biennial budget or just over 5% of the roughly $60 billion the government is on track to spend over the next two years. It’s not a big deal, except it is a structural deficit that the state has encountered every budget session for the past ten years or so. In the past it had been closed though a combination of tax increases, borrowing and wonderfully creative accounting.
The current governor campaigned on specifically on eliminating this structural deficit without new taxes or more debt. In the 2010 election the governorship and both houses of the legislature went from Democratic to Republican control. Much of the weirdness in Madison over the past two weeks has been the result of an insane denial of the new political reality and is a temper tantrum if you will.
But there is deeper insanity. That is the economic reality that few of us will acknowledge. In this blog I’ve tended to view things from the perspective of households. I believe households are foundation upon which so much rests.
There are roughly 2 million households in Wisconsin. At $30 billion a year, the state is spending roughly $15 thousand dollars per household. Add to that local property taxes and that number begins to approach 20 thousand. Given that there are just under 115 million households in the US. At $4.5 trillion a year, the federal government is spending another $34 thousand per household per year. 11 thousand of that is barrowed on our behalf.
The median household income in the US is around $50 thousand per year. Given that reality, temper tantrums simply will not do.