Call Me Morfar
My grandson has begun to speak. I am the Morfar.
Morfar is Old Norse for maternal grandfather. And I chose to
be called that rather than grandpa, first because it has certain Nordic
fierceness, and second grandpa sounds too old to suit me.
With regard to reason the first, it seems to have had some
effect. My daughter says I am the only one he listens to, but she says the same
about her two somewhat unruly, medium large dogs. I kind of believe whatever
sort of fierceness I’ve projected to my grandson is not because I am the
Morfar, but rather he has noticed that the dogs listen and obey. In the child’s
mind he has wondered what the dogs know that he should know too. And it’s not that I’m some sort of grumpy ogre
hovering over him. I sing songs to him. I read books to him (including dramatic
readings of The Little Engine that Could).
I crawl on the ground and play cars and trucks with him while making all the
appropriate sound effects. Still if I say “don’t mess with that, or stay out of
there, don’t do that or you'll break your neck kid,” he listens. My daughter is
impressed.
With regard to reason the second, I’m not so sure. I have a
two-year old grandson. That means my life has spanned two generations and has
entered its third. Looking back to when I was still in my early twenties, I
thought America had put race behind it. Now entering the third generation of my
life time, I’ve found then I was terribly mistaken.
A Tale of Two
Cultures
Milwaukee has become more racially divided, more
economically divided and more violent. Per capita, the city of Milwaukee’s
murder rate is higher than Chicago’s and the violence is spreading, so much so
as to attract national attention. [Full Text]
Ugly scenes like the one that occurred a few weekends ago at
Tosafest are too common. Milwaukee is
not alone. Writing in The American
Thinker, Colin Flaherty describes the situation in Baltimore:
““Impressions matter. Crime stats do
not,” lamented Peter Hermann, chief crime apologist for the Baltimore Sun.
Hermann
was explaining life in the big city to a New Jersey yokel who wanted to know
what happened to the large group of black people that was rampaging through
downtown Baltimore, attacking people, destroying property, and creating mayhem.
All beneath her hotel balcony window in the upscale Inner Harbor.
That
really does not narrow it down much, because what seemed “scary” to her,
Hermann said, was “normal and routine” to grizzled observers of the gritty
Baltimore crime beat. Police “made no arrests, saw no crime, had no reason to
make an announcement. There’s not even a report -- it’s just something that
happens,” he said.”” [Full Text]
It’s troubling, to the point where latest
fashion in social theory – “white privilege” – seemed provocatively
sensible. But while I might be an agent
in “white privilege” by no means does that implicitly make me an agent of
racial oppression. As I see it, here’s how it goes:
My grandson will grow up in a stable and secure household.
He will be surrounded with a regular cohort of grandparents, aunts, uncles and
cousins. These people will be mostly be from the educated middle class and
upper middle class. By the time he enters the first grade: he will have been
extensively read to; have listened to Beethoven, Mozart, Bach and Hayden;
possibly been to a motorcycle rally; allowed to run in the countryside; and
maybe have caught a fine trout from a small stream with a cane pole. One day my
grandson will survey the opportunities that are opening before him and the sort
of work he likes. He will enter adulthood richly full of possibilities.
Another kid, living on the north side of Milwaukee, might
grow up in an unsettled house hold, and whose siblings might not have the same
father and maybe one or more of those are incarcerated. It could be a household
where books are absent, as are personal computers other than “smart phones,”
and parents who do not place their kid’s school achievement too high among
their priorities, and a place where the sound of gun fire is not infrequent.
Here a child too often arrives to teenage years, and surveys his prospects, and
finds he is already defeated. His best prospects are gangs, drugs, strong arm
robberies and theft.
White Privilege: A
Mistaken Social Theory
The contrast between those social environments graphically
define nature of what is now fashionably called “white privilege,” but somehow this
is nothing new and it hasn’t much to do explicitly with race. Many black
Americans enjoy productive middle class and upper middle class lives while too
many others seem to be locked out.
John Ogbu is a former anthropologist at the University of
California – Berkeley sociologist and immigrant from Nigeria. In The American, Jason L. Riley profiles
Ogbu’s social theory on the racial gap in K-12 education:
“None of the
versions of the class-inequality [argument] can explain why black students from
similar social class backgrounds, residing in the same neighborhood, and
attending the same school, don’t do as well as white students,” wrote Ogbu.
“Within the black population, of course, middle-class children do better, on
the average, than lower-class children, just as in the white population.
However, when blacks and whites from similar socioeconomic backgrounds are
compared, one sees that black students at every class level perform less well
in school than their white counterparts.”
Ogbu and his
team of researchers were given access to parents, teachers, principals,
administrators, and students in the Shaker Heights school district, which was
one of the country’s best. And he concluded that black culture, more than
anything else, explained the academic achievement gap. The black kids readily
admitted that they didn’t work as hard as whites, took easier classes, watched
more TV, and read fewer books. “A kind of norm of minimum effort appeared to
exist among black students,” wrote Ogbu. “The students themselves recognized
this and used it to explain both their academic behaviors and their low academic
achievement performance.” Due to peer pressure, some black students “didn’t
work as hard as they should and could.” Among their black friends, “it was not
cool to be successful” or “to work hard or to show you’re smart.” One female
student said that some black students believed “it was cute to be dumb.” Asked
why, “she said it was because they couldn’t do well and that they didn’t want
anyone else to do well.” [Full Text]
According to
Wikipedia Ogbu theorized that because
the black American sub-culture has its roots in non-voluntary immigration -- of
slavery, institutional discrimination -- Jim Crow, and cultural racism, the
seeds were sown for an oppositional culture and an identity that rejects the
dominant culture’s values, speech and behavior.
I think that may be true. But to call it “white
privilege” is to take an incredible leap in logic.
Cultural Opposition is Nothing
New
Ogbu’s
oppositional cultures are not a new idea after all. John Milton, in Paradise
Lost, had Satan declare in long soliloquy after finding himself banished to hell:
“Infernal world, and thou, profoundest hell,
Receive thy new possessor: … Here at least
We shall be free …
To reign is worth ambition, though in hell:
Better to
reign in hell than serve in heav’n”
That’s kind
of the point we’ve come to. The racial optimism I had in the early 1970s was
misplaced. As has happened so often since the end of the Civil War, the hope
for many black Americans to fully participate in the American economy had the
rug pulled from beneath it. Much of the manufacturing economy that had
supported working class/middle class families, at the time, in matter of a
decade or so dissolved. Some parts of it moved to the distant suburban
industrial parks. More of it was outsourced – to Taiwan, Korea, Mexico, the Caribbean
and now more dominantly to China.
It’s the Economy, Stupid
In our
central cities, a household supporting economy was replaced with a household
destroying social welfare, food stamp economy. And suddenly Milwaukee’s and in other
city’s urban centers the dormant seeds of an oppositional culture have
violently bloomed.
So to answer
that problem the educational establishment has embraced “white privilege,” a
lame exercise in racial sensitivity training. It’s a label which both our
educational and social welfare establishments raise as shield rather than
confront decades of failure. It deflects blame elsewhere.
Meanwhile for
the most part, our cities, our states and the federal government have done
nothing to create an environment for economic growth and opportunity. Instead,
we have created a regulatory labyrinth that challenges existing corporations
and makes start-ups almost impossible. (Should you start a business and employ
a few people, you will find you have become a full-time regulatory compliance
manager, tax collector and increasingly a data collector.) We have combined
corporate tax rates that are almost confiscatory and are noncompetitive in a
world economy. And the economics of corporate cronyism, where government across
the board and in an almost fascist manner, determines who in both the private and public
sectors reap the economic rewards.
It seems
that’s mostly how it is in most of America and more so in our urban
neighborhoods, but I I wouldn’t put the “white privilege” racial label on it.
Instead, I think I would rather call it the “privilege of the ruling elite.”